FFH Assessment for Wind Turbines
The FFH assessment (FFH-VP) examines whether a project is compatible with the conservation objectives of a Natura 2000 site. It is an independent procedure under § 34 BNatSchG, carried out parallel to or following the BImSchG permit.
FFH and Bird Protection Areas in German Nature Conservation Law
Natura 2000 is the European protected area network with two pillars:
- FFH areas (Habitats Directive 92/43/EEC) — protection of habitat types and species of Annexes I + II
- Bird protection areas (Birds Directive 79/409/EEC resp. 2009/147/EC) — protection of wild bird species
Both have their own conservation objectives (species-specific and site-specific), which are specified by national ordinances.
FFH Screening vs. Full Assessment
| Stage | When? | Scope |
|---|---|---|
| FFH Screening | WTG in or near FFH area, but conservation objectives possibly unaffected | Compact assessment per conservation objective; possible negative certificate |
| FFH Full Assessment | Significant impact on conservation objectives cannot be excluded | Comprehensive compatibility study, often spanning multiple seasons |
| Derogation procedure per § 34 para. 3 | Full assessment concludes "not compatible", but compelling reasons + no alternatives + coherence measures | Approval still possible, but very rarely successful |
FFH assessment cascade — from screening to derogation under § 34 BNatSchG
Trigger Distances — When Is an FFH Assessment Required?
- Within the FFH area: FFH assessment always required (screening at minimum)
- Directly at the FFH area boundary: FFH assessment due to direct impact
- Within the functional range of conservation objectives: e.g. bird species with large territories (red kite, black stork, white-tailed eagle) — up to 6 km distance
- Coherence areas: where conservation objectives have interactions with neighbouring sites
Contents of the Full Assessment
- Site characterisation: catalogue all conservation objectives of the FFH area
- Impact prognosis of WTG construction and operation on each conservation objective individually
- Significance assessment: for each objective — is conservation endangered?
- Cumulative effects with other plans/projects in the area
- Mitigation measures: shutdown periods, seasonal restrictions, turbine positioning
- Final assessment: compatible / not compatible
Costs
Guide value EUR 8,000–40,000. Key factors:
- FFH screening (compact): EUR 4,000–10,000
- Full assessment with cartographic surveys: EUR 15,000–30,000
- Full assessment with own breeding/resting bird survey (1–2 seasons): EUR 25,000–60,000
- Derogation procedure with coherence measures: additionally EUR 30,000–80,000
Who Prepares the Assessment?
Environmental planning / nature conservation firms with FFH experience. Important: regional experience with the conservation objectives of the specific sites + calibrated methodology by federal state (e.g. NRW: LANUV methodology, Brandenburg: LfU).
Commission an FFH assessment
We connect you with a specialist firm with regional FFH experience — ideally combining the species protection assessment and landscape management plan under one roof.
Get in touchFrequently Asked Questions
What is the difference between an FFH assessment and a species protection report?
Both examine birds and other species, but under different legal bases. The species protection assessment under § 44 BNatSchG checks individual killing and disturbance prohibitions. The FFH assessment under § 34 checks site-specific conservation objectives. Both may be required — the requirements differ.
How long does a full FFH assessment take?
If own surveys are needed: 1–2 breeding seasons + assessment phase, total typically 18–30 months. With existing data: 4–8 months. For repowering, the timeline can be shortened if data from the existing turbine is available.
Is the authority bound by the FFH assessment conclusion?
Yes — if the full assessment finds "significantly impairing", the authority must deny the permit unless the derogation procedure (§ 34 para. 3 BNatSchG) is successfully completed.
What are "compelling reasons of overriding public interest"?
Since the WaLG (2022) and § 2 EEG, wind energy has been classified as being of "overriding importance" — this eases the derogation procedure. However, the hurdle remains high: the absence of alternatives must be demonstrated and coherence must be secured in another area.