RepoweringHub
Guide · CO2 Balance

How Much CO2 Does a Wind Turbine Save?

In short: In the German electricity grid mix, an average of 344 g CO₂ is emitted per kilowatt-hour of electricity (source: UBA, 2025). Every kWh of wind power displaces this fossil share — a modern 6 MW turbine with an annual yield of 18 GWh therefore saves around 6,200 tonnes of CO₂ per year.

The Calculation

CO₂ savings [t/year] = annual yield [GWh] × emission factor [344 g/kWh] / 1,000

TurbineAnnual yieldCO₂ savings/yearover 20 years
Old turbine 1.5 MW~3 GWh~1,000 t~20,000 t
Modern 3 MW~8 GWh~2,800 t~55,000 t
Modern 6 MW~18 GWh~6,200 t~124,000 t
6 MW top site~23 GWh~7,900 t~158,000 t

Grid Mix Comparison — Historical and Current

Yearg CO₂ / kWh grid mix DESource
2024363 gUBA 2024
2025 (preliminary)344 gUBA 2025

The factor falls with each further expansion of renewables — good for the climate overall, but in purely arithmetic terms it reduces the CO₂ savings value of a single new wind turbine. As long as the grid mix is not entirely CO₂-free, the effect remains clearly positive.

Energy Payback

Modern onshore wind turbines typically recover the energy input for their manufacture and construction within under one year of operation. Over their 25-year service life they therefore deliver many times the manufacturing energy invested. This order of magnitude applies across the industry; specific values are reported in the manufacturers' life-cycle analyses (LCA).

Repowering effect: A modern 6 MW turbine notionally replaces six old 1.5 MW turbines. In CO₂ terms this does not mean a "6-fold effect" — because the old turbines also ran with low CO₂. But: 5 sites are freed up, and the new turbine produces the old amount of energy with a significantly better energy return.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why does the grid mix CO₂ value not fall faster?

Because coal and gas power plants are dispatchable and fill the gaps in the renewable generation profile. Only with extensive expansion of storage and flexibility will the remaining fossil share fall quickly.

Does the construction energy input really "cancel out"?

Yes — energy payback has been methodologically well established for decades. The LCA comparison with fossil electricity generation comes out clearly in favour of wind even when conservative assumptions are chosen.

Are there methodological debates?

Yes, above all about the right reference value: against which grid mix do you compare? The UBA factor (average) is the standard; some methods use the marginal mix — which is higher (fossil) in many hours and lower in others.

CO2 savings of a wind turbine: formula annual yield times 344 g CO2 per kWh (UBA 2025). Old turbine 1.5 MW saves 1,000 t per year, modern 3 MW 2,800 t, modern 6 MW 6,200 t, 6 MW top site 7,900 t per year. Over 20 years up to 158,000 t CO2. Energy payback under 1 year, then 24 years of net energy gain. Emission factor falling: 363 g 2024 to 344 g 2025

CO2 savings by turbine size – UBA factor, 20-year balance and energy payback

Planning a repowering project?

Get a non-binding initial assessment of yield, CO₂ balance and permitting for your site.

Contact us