RepoweringHub
Expert Report · Part of the Species Protection Report · BNatSchG sec. 44

Bird Survey for Wind Turbines

The avifaunal survey (avifaunistisches Gutachten) records the breeding and resting birds within the impact zone of the planned turbines and assesses the killing and disturbance risk under sec. 44 BNatSchG. It is the ornithological component of the comprehensive species protection report and usually the critical path in the entire permitting procedure.

What is surveyed?

  1. Breeding bird mapping following the “Methodology Standards for Recording Breeding Birds in Germany” (Suedbeck et al., DDA 2005)
  2. Territory mapping for non-colonial breeders: 6–10 field visits from March to July
  3. Nest inspections for particularly relevant raptors (red kite, black kite, white-tailed eagle) within an extended radius
  4. Resting bird survey where the site is in migration corridors — autumn/spring field visits
  5. Functional habitat analysis: Where do the birds breed, hunt, and fly over the project area?
  6. Assessment according to the Helgoland Paper (LAG VSW) and sec. 45b BNatSchG

Key conflict species and exclusion zones

SpeciesClose rangeAssessment zoneNotes
Red kite1,500 m1,500–4,000 mGenerally not permittable in close range; in assessment zone often feasible with anti-collision system (ABS)
White-tailed eagle3,000 m3,000–6,000 mStrict exclusion, compatibility rarely demonstrable
Black stork3,000 m3,000–10,000 mDisturbance-sensitive, wide deflection corridors
Montagu's harrier1,000 m1,000–4,000 mBreeding site changes annually — ongoing monitoring required
Honey buzzard1,000 m1,000–4,000 mStandardised since sec. 45b BNatSchG
Hen harrier, Short-eared owl, Corncrake1,000 mLocal significance, varies regionally
Exclusion zones around bird nests in wind turbine planning: Red kite 1,500/4,000 m, White-tailed eagle 3,000/6,000 m, Black stork 3,000/10,000 m according to sec. 45b BNatSchG

Exclusion zones around bird nests per sec. 45b BNatSchG — close range (red) vs. assessment zone (orange)

Survey effort and timeline

  • One full breeding-bird season: 6–10 field visits March–August
  • Two seasons at complex sites or when required by the authority
  • Nest inspections typically via two additional spring field visits
  • Resting/migratory bird survey if relevant: 8–12 visits between September and April
Practical note: The breeding-bird survey is usually the critical path in the BImSchG procedure. Starting the survey in May means the earliest reliable data will not be available until August of the following year. Early commissioning is essential.

What does it cost?

Guideline cost €15,000–45,000 for a full survey over one season; with two seasons or proximity to bird protection areas, up to €80,000. Key factors:

  • Number of turbines + size of the project area
  • Required seasons (1 vs. 2)
  • Resting bird component where migration corridors are involved
  • Habitats Directive assessment for sites near protected areas

Who prepares it?

Ecological engineering consultancies specialising in avifauna with long-standing survey experience in the relevant region. Key criterion: calibrated methodology aligned with state-level requirements (e.g. LANUV guideline NRW, Hesse guideline, Helgoland Paper).

Request a bird survey

We connect you with a specialist consultancy experienced in regional field surveys — ideally well before the breeding-bird season starts.

Get in touch

Frequently asked questions

What happens if a red kite nest is found in the project area?

Within the close-range zone (1,500 m), the turbine is generally not permittable. In the assessment zone (1,500–4,000 m), the turbine may be permitted with an anti-collision system or seasonal curtailment during the breeding season.

Can the survey be carried over from the existing installation during repowering?

Partially — the WaLG (2022) introduced simplifications. For 1:1 repowering without site relocation, existing survey data can be used, though an updated survey is usually still required.

What about raptors not listed in sec. 45b BNatSchG?

For species outside Annex 1 to sec. 45b, the previous regional guidelines continue to apply. The permitting authority decides on a case-by-case basis — which makes the consultancy's regional expertise particularly important.

How reliable is a survey?

With properly applied Suedbeck methodology, very reliable. Authorities accept the procedure without fundamental objections — disputes tend to arise around the assessment (significance testing, CEF measures) rather than the field data.